Re: under repped flush, should i keep it that way?
 

i want to comment on people saying to lead turn:

im not a fan because alot of times he is either bluffing or has a small overpair.

if i bet turn, he is going to let go of his bluff. if he has an overpair he might call one more bet and shut down. however, i can get the same amount from an overpair when he checks the turn and calls the river when i bet.

if he picked up a flush draw with overcards, a decent player would likely lead again for a good sized bet. but if i bet 75-80% psb he might fold KQ with a spade.

just my thoughts.

Re: under repped flush, should i keep it that way?
 

I would c/r this turn to $300 with how deep you guys are, making stacks good in relation to size of pot to shove river. As played, I don't like this. His smallish turn bet is a flush or weakish hand/decent spade. I don't think it's a pure bluff after you call him on the flop. As played, I would probably bet/call river for $325, since I think he's more likely to call a bet rather than calling a c/rai with the non-nut flush this deep. I would have c/r turn for value, you could easily be up against a decent pocket pair on turn like 99 where he might call down or very easily lower flush; I think he has something based on his 1/2 pot bet.

Re: under repped flush, should i keep it that way?
 

[ QUOTE ]
bet/fold >>>>>>>> check/fold >> check/call

[/ QUOTE ]

lol.