Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

others do the same ... which is another reason a bet is good in this spot.

Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

I think checking behind the turn is some results oriented thinking; there's a lot of value to be had with a turn bet.

Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

I check the turn here a lot, but once you do that, you pretty much have to call all blank rivers.

Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

If villian is so smart why is he pricing us in for our full house draw with his made flush?

Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

[ QUOTE ]
If villian is so smart why is he pricing us in for our full house draw with his made flush?

[/ QUOTE ]

Cause board is totally safe for his flush assuming i don't have a set.

Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

I'd three-bet shove the turn. Why is nobody else doing that?

Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

[ QUOTE ]
Ac doesn't change anything either.

[/ QUOTE ]

It makes it somewhat more likely he has naked A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] IMO.

Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

Kramer, it's not that a flush card turned, it's that a flush card turned in combination with villain's specific line. I agree that checking behind on the turn with a set head's up is generally not something you should be doing, but this is an exception.

Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'd three-bet shove the turn. Why is nobody else doing that?

[/ QUOTE ]

Shoving into an opponent who has represented a hand that has us beat?

Re: Standard set fold in stars 109
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'd three-bet shove the turn. Why is nobody else doing that?

[/ QUOTE ]

What exactly is this supposed to accomplish?