Re: differences in strength in micro limit games
 

I think the occasional suck-out is more than worth it for all of the money you make from loose-passives.

Don't be in a hurry to jump up in limits. There's a great deal of money to be made at .25/.50 and .50/1.00 and it doesn't require that you be excellent at poker.

Enjoy the free money!

Re: differences in strength in micro limit games
 

Well I have only gone from $1/$2 to $2/$4. And I have only played about 5k hands at $2/$4 and have noticed that at the difference in the games does not touch the rakebreak I get on Full Tilt. The games are easier and harder in some respects. If I raise a limper with QJ and the flop comes up ugly. I am much more likely to steal it with a single bet when it is likely I do not have the best hand. But at $1/$2 I had to double barrel to have a chance at stealing a pot. Now there is a bit more check/raising here and a lot more bluffing. But again it works to my advantage because the screwplay is easier to use at this level. So I say the play is about the same after the adjustments but I am paying much less rake and at about 2BB/100 hands up to this point. That will probably drop a bit but really there is nothing special about the play there.

Re: differences in strength in micro limit games
 

eskimo is being facetious guys.

Re: differences in strength in micro limit games
 

If you practice good table selection and play multiple sites you should be able to find good tables at almost all times at almost any limit. The play will be completely different as you move up (the fish will be 50/20 instead of 35/2), but they will be good tables nonetheless.

Now I just need to start practicing what I preach - all my money is on Stars and I need to diversify.