Re: 50nl: 66 deep stacked
 

I think you have to call river. This is the reason you cannot raise:

Board: 2h 6d Jc Ks 2d
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 50.000% 50.00% 00.00% 6 0.00 { 6h6s }
Hand 1: 50.000% 50.00% 00.00% 6 0.00 { KK+, JJ }

I Think the turn check is also good, as you're only getting 1 more street of value at most vs QQ, and I'm not too sure I want to play for stacks on the turn

Re: 50nl: 66 deep stacked
 

Call river. This hand is well played on all streets and your reasoning behind each decision is solid.

Re: 50nl: 66 deep stacked
 

[ QUOTE ]
I check behind because I don't think he calls QQ here

[/ QUOTE ] If you were the villain, would you fold QQ to a bet on the turn? I mean, look at your betting pattern. It doesn't look at all like AK or KQ. Not in any way, that I can tell. KQ is folding preflop, and AK is reraising to put the short stack all in and keep everybody else away. Plus, I don't think AK or KQ would be so anxious to bet the flop when the villain has shown such strength preflop and the hero has been passive.

So why is the turn card a scare card for the villain when he has QQ? I just don't see it.

Bet the turn. Take the rest of his money on the river. Well, give him the rest of your money on the river.

Re: 50nl: 66 deep stacked
 

[ QUOTE ]
Original raiser is pretty donkish/aggressive and short so I call in position.

[/ QUOTE ] You barely have the odds to call this preflop, I think, and that's assuming that you stack the villian everytime you hit your six. You state "short" as if that's a good thing, but it's not, of course.