Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
shandrax: you're probably a fish. keep donating.

[/ QUOTE ]

My bad, didn't realize that this section was for the idiots to get some self-confidence back by laughing about others.

[/ QUOTE ]
check post count before you respond next time to save yourself the embarrassment.

Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
shandrax: you're probably a fish. keep donating.

[/ QUOTE ]

My bad, didn't realize that this section was for the idiots to get some self-confidence back by laughing about others.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

next time you defend 97o to a button raise, ask yourself "what am I trying to flop OOP that I will like?"

(2 pair obv)

edit: unless this is minbet, in which case, lol minbet

Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

doomswitch, amirite?

Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

What are "community cards"? Sounds sh*t.

Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

the odds of this are 568238476:1.5

Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

[ QUOTE ]
next time you defend 97o to a button raise, ask yourself "what am I trying to flop OOP that I will like?"

(2 pair obv)

edit: unless this is minbet, in which case, lol minbet

[/ QUOTE ]

9-7o is the min-cutoff against someone raising with optimal range on the button. Losing to a 1-outer makes it look like a donk-call, but in fact it wasn't. I guess this whole story is a case of rocket science meets caveman and gets busted.

Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
next time you defend 97o to a button raise, ask yourself "what am I trying to flop OOP that I will like?"

(2 pair obv)

edit: unless this is minbet, in which case, lol minbet

[/ QUOTE ]

9-7o is the min-cutoff against someone raising with optimal range on the button. Losing to a 1-outer makes it look like a donk-call, but in fact it wasn't. I guess this whole story is a case of rocket science meets caveman and gets busted.

[/ QUOTE ]

YOU MOTHER [censored]

Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
next time you defend 97o to a button raise, ask yourself "what am I trying to flop OOP that I will like?"

(2 pair obv)

edit: unless this is minbet, in which case, lol minbet

[/ QUOTE ]

9-7o is the min-cutoff against someone raising with optimal range on the button. Losing to a 1-outer makes it look like a donk-call, but in fact it wasn't. I guess this whole story is a case of rocket science meets caveman and gets busted.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, you're exactly right. Rocket scientist for sure.

Re: Seriously, what are the odds for this to happen back to back?
 

[ QUOTE ]
back to back

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
folded 2 hands, then...

[/ QUOTE ]

Aha!