Re: Jamie Gold at is again
 

http://image.com.com/tv/images/video...yer_medvid.jpg
HATE! HATE! HATE!

Re: Jamie Gold at is again
 

I'm not saying he's not good, but if you look at Main Event champs the following year they tend to have decent success because many times they are given lots of chips in situations where they normally wouldn't since other people are so desperately trying to beat them out of a pot/knock them out so they can go home with a story.

Re: Jamie Gold at is again
 

Lol I just listened to his rounders interview. This is perhaps the cockiest person in the history of anything.

I wish him no tournament success.

Re: Jamie Gold at is again
 

[ QUOTE ]
Without looking at CP, it'd be fair to assume Brian Haveson, Nick Frangos, Micky Appleman, and D'Agostino are all in the top 10 as well. The USPC sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

wtf are you talking about?

nicky and dags are dirty.

Re: Jamie Gold at is again
 

[ QUOTE ]
Lol I just listened to his rounders interview. This is perhaps the cockiest person in the history of anything.

I wish him no tournament success.

[/ QUOTE ]

link?

Re: Jamie Gold at is again
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lol I just listened to his rounders interview. This is perhaps the cockiest person in the history of anything.

I wish him no tournament success.

[/ QUOTE ]

link?

[/ QUOTE ]

http://www.bigpoker.ca/resources/rou...2006-08-13.mp3

Re: Jamie Gold at is again
 

[ QUOTE ]
maybe now people understand

I don't think you can be chiplead for the last five (?) days in the main event with a record breaking field and win it all on luck. and, never being out of the top 100 overall.

[/ QUOTE ]
And what pray-tell have you based this on? In-depth quantitative analysis, or your razor-sharp intuition?

Re: Jamie Gold at is again
 

[ QUOTE ]
maybe now people understand

I don't think you can be chiplead for the last five (?) days in the main event with a record breaking field and win it all on luck. and, never being out of the top 100 overall.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a joke right?