Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

The best part of this screenshot was the 3 limit tournaments. Can't image how he got registered for them...

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Also, I think the regulars are beatable by ~30% through the 109s at prime hours by an elite player.

*Ducks*

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Sorry for the hijack, but I see this so often. What does FYP mean? For Your Pleasure?

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry for the hijack, but I see this so often. What does FYP mean? For Your Pleasure?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope. [censored] You Pussy. J/K - its "fixed your post"

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Ah, thank you very much. Anyway, OP is on the biggest heater since Moneymaker.

WTF - sorry for bumping this. It was on the third page, can't logically see how this happened. Apologies.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

I started playing STTs shortly before the party change, so I don't really remember the old structure..but were numbers like this even possible back then...

I'm very confused and most of all very disheartened from seeing this...

damn whoever bumped this thing...I was much happier an hour ago [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Bill, thats 50k so far in May... 10k per day.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok ok, not matter whether it is true or not, I'll just choose to take it as a lie.[img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

What's with the thread necromancy?

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

I personally think this person is just faking / stealing pokertracker stats. But it could be loloTRICKEDu, in theory...

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

I thought I had already read this. this thread is a year old people. We have a phantom bumper on our hands!