Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Sporting Events (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=48)
-   -   MLB theoretical All-Star team (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=115596)

PokerFink 05-17-2006 05:29 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
[ QUOTE ]
Utley, not too familar with him but 2b seems to be a very horrible position, stats wise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Utley is easily the best all-around second baseman in baseball. I know I'm biased as a Philly guy, but here is is among all 2B:

.303 BA (7th)
.375 OBP (4th)
.542 SLG (1st)
.917 OPS (1st)
8 HR (1st)
26 RBI (2nd)

Plus he has good speed and a pretty good glove.

New001 05-17-2006 05:32 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know much about Jason Bay but looking at his stats, they aren't all that impressive this year, .265, 6 HR, 20 RBIs, 4 SB and he plays LF (correct me if I'm wrong). He's there instead of Jones who is the yearly Golden Glove Winner + 2nd in the MVP vote who is batting .294, 9 HRs and 39 RBI and 3 SB...Hmmmm...

Giles is batting .273 with 3 Hrs and 21 RBis, over Vlade, Blake (Cleveland), Ichiro, Mags, etc.

Utley, not too familar with him but 2b seems to be a very horrible position, stats wise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, Jason Bay was the fourth most valuable player last year and extremely +++ on defense.

EDIT: And you think Utley is bad because of what, 30 games of the 2006 season? Jesus.

[/ QUOTE ]
Is Bay + Manny better than Bay + Jones when defense is factored in?

RedBean 05-17-2006 05:35 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
[ QUOTE ]

there is no way the current incarnation of Bonds belongs on this team, even at DH.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not a big fan of On Base Percentage, eh?

New001 05-17-2006 05:36 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
How is Bonds this year better than Jason Giambi or even Derrek Lee?

capone0 05-17-2006 05:37 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
So he plays in front of Jones who was 2nd in the MVP, has better stats and is a better defender? Hmmm...makes sense.

capone0 05-17-2006 05:39 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
Very good numbers. Just said I'm not familar.

PokerFink 05-17-2006 05:39 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

there is no way the current incarnation of Bonds belongs on this team, even at DH.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not a big fan of On Base Percentage, eh?

[/ QUOTE ]

Aliens will take one look at Bond's numbers this year and realize that walking him all the time is stupid.

Plus he can't run the bases anyway.

PokerFink 05-17-2006 05:41 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
[ QUOTE ]
Very good numbers. Just said I'm not familar.

[/ QUOTE ]

I know. Utley is my boy. I figured I would familiarize you =)

capone0 05-17-2006 05:41 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
4th best player accordint to who?

In the NL:

He was 12th in the voting.

Who is he better than? Lee, Jones, Pujois had better numbers. Better than A-Rod, Ortiz, Vlade and Manny in the West?

sublime 05-17-2006 05:41 PM

Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
 
[ QUOTE ]
He was 12th in the voting.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.