Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Politics (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=43)
-   -   Ron Paul's glaring downfall (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=547406)

MidGe 11-16-2007 05:56 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
[ QUOTE ]
RP: Religious institutions should be more important than government

[/ QUOTE ]
Nutty statement


[ QUOTE ]
RP: I want to abolish the Dept of Education

[/ QUOTE ]
Amazing from someone who benefited from it!


[ QUOTE ]
RP: I want to abolish the IRS

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, all infrastructure is or should be free.


That RP guy sounds like an absolute nut to me! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Mr_Moore 11-16-2007 05:58 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
RP: Religious institutions should be more important than government

[/ QUOTE ]
Nutty statement


[ QUOTE ]
RP: I want to abolish the Dept of Education

[/ QUOTE ]
Amazing from someone who benefited from it!


[ QUOTE ]
RP: I want to abolish the IRS

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, all infrastructure is or should be free.


That RP guy sounds like an absolute nut to me! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

You sir will get this thread going in no time.

NewTeaBag 11-16-2007 05:59 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Far from being "The Downfall"

This is a mere "tempest in a teapot."

For those wishing to "Downfall" RP, they're are far more important and contentious issues to go after.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your typos/writing problems made it hard to understand what you are saying here.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
So much for my great "tuq" experiment in "typing with my balls."


Whet I wassa tryin ta sey wassza dat this XMAS letter bout religiousity is blown out of all proportion and is not a downfall issue.

Though I support RP, he has far more important and controversial positions which intelligent people can debate and form up/down opinions on than this particular silliness.

AlexM 11-16-2007 06:05 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
RP: I want to abolish the Dept of Education

[/ QUOTE ]
Amazing from someone who benefited from it!


[/ QUOTE ]

How?

Taso 11-16-2007 06:08 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
RP: Religious institutions should be more important than government

[/ QUOTE ]
Nutty statement


[ QUOTE ]
RP: I want to abolish the Dept of Education

[/ QUOTE ]
Amazing from someone who benefited from it!


[ QUOTE ]
RP: I want to abolish the IRS

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, all infrastructure is or should be free.


That RP guy sounds like an absolute nut to me! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

[x] annoying smileys
[x] excessive exclamation points
[x] writing without any knowledge of topic (apparently what the IRS is)
[x] starting to post right as Taso is going to bed


Yes, it'd a Midge post.

Kurn, son of Mogh 11-16-2007 08:25 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.

[/ QUOTE ]

I do not think this says what you think it says.

In fact, it doesn't say anything controversial at all.

[/ QUOTE ]

"The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers"

Does this mean what i think it means?

[/ QUOTE ]

All the Constitution says about religion is that Congress may not pass a law establishing a State Church, and neither can Congress pass laws that prohibit people from practicing religion.

The words "separation of church and state" are not in the Constitution.

MidGe 11-16-2007 08:27 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
[x] adds nothing to the op, is not even relevant! Yes it is a Taso post! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [sic]

Taso 11-16-2007 08:41 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
touche.

Midge, which candidate do you want to win anyways?

MidGe 11-16-2007 08:43 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
Obama! Without a shadow of a doubt! If not Obama, then any democrat.

Taso 11-16-2007 08:46 AM

Re: Ron Paul\'s glaring downfall
 
Ok. Just so you know, Obama voted to fund the Iraq war. Ron Paul didn't.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.