Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

[ QUOTE ]
LOL Rutgers +3.5 2H THX BOOKMAKER

[/ QUOTE ]

i also added on a little to my rutgers bet at +3.5

Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

ru +3.5
u31.5

-110 both

Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

what happened? i had to use my eraser [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

damn, cards on the 18 with 1:31 left. Need to hold to a FG here.

Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

I already spent this money [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

[ QUOTE ]
I already spent this money [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

[ QUOTE ]
Leaning LV in this game. Thoughts?

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, like 11 posters in a row were on RU in this game/half. That's some sort of record I'd say, and with typical results.

Seriously, has there been another game where 11 [much less most of them regs] all agreed on a game/side? Right or wrong?

Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Leaning LV in this game. Thoughts?

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, like 11 posters in a row were on RU in this game/half.
That's some sort of record I'd say, and with typical results.

Seriously, has there been another game where 11 [much less most of them regs] all agreed on a game/side? Right or wrong?

[/ QUOTE ]
myself, i love consensi like this. i'm ever at a loss when people express surprise that lot's of folks together really AREN'T more intelligent than any single one of them.

i have a means to measure the i.q of any group:

(smallest i.q. in the group)/(number of individuals in the group) = groupal i.q.

out of a spirit of goodwill, i will not apply that formula to this particular bunch...

-c

Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Leaning LV in this game. Thoughts?

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, like 11 posters in a row were on RU in this game/half. That's some sort of record I'd say, and with typical results.

Seriously, has there been another game where 11 [much less most of them regs] all agreed on a game/side? Right or wrong?

[/ QUOTE ]

Eh, I've seen it close to that sometimes, but yeah, it was quite a consensus. Public was on U of L though and both the pregame and halftime steam was toward Rutgers, so I can't complain. I'll take +3.5 -110 when it closes at +3 -115 (2H line) every time.

Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
 

but you have to admit -2.5 -105 is better.