Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

You could open-shove preflop its propably +cEV

Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

[ QUOTE ]
You could open-shove preflop its propably +cEV

[/ QUOTE ]

probably

Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

and by probably i mean wtf are you talking about?

Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

is bet 3bet with intention of either getting it in or pot size shoving any turn bad? we're not that bad vs anything but jj really and some people fold overpairs.

Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

I think (hope) it's a read-dependent call PF. WTF bet flop.

Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

to clarify, i'm ok w/ raising pre, although I usually wouldn't. There's a big difference between T9s-86s and 63s. At a sixmax cash table, this is definitely a fold from MP, nine-handed in a donkament it's probably more likely the CO and BN will fold. So whatever, go ahead LAG it up.

Calling the 3b oop is really bad, especially if you plan to aggressively checkcall two streets on this board. Letting 88 see the river is awful.

This is a three barrel, a b3b, a c-c, c-r turn. Anything but c-c, c-c.

Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

[ QUOTE ]
to clarify, i'm ok w/ raising pre, although I usually wouldn't. There's a big difference between T9s-86s and 63s. At a sixmax cash table, this is definitely a fold from MP, nine-handed in a donkament it's probably more likely the CO and BN will fold. So whatever, go ahead LAG it up.

Calling the 3b oop is really bad, especially if you plan to aggressively checkcall two streets on this board. Letting 88 see the river is awful.

This is a three barrel, a b3b, a c-c, c-r turn. Anything but c-c, c-c.

[/ QUOTE ]
I assumed you meant the intial raise, because I thought calling the reraise was automatic. Villain reraised small preflop and I was priced in. I would rather play this hand to a reraise than KJo. This is a pretty good hand to stack aces with.

Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

How much should I bet on the river?

Again, I can see criticizing the preflop raise, but the call of the reraise seems automatic. I don't see why I need a read for that getting 2.7-1 pot odds. I actually thought that was a good situation.

Obviously, I like to post hands involving unusual plays. I also find that playing nonstandard moves sometimes gives me flexibility and confuses my opponents.

I recognize that this may not be the most interesting hand. However, it seems that most of the people making fun of my posts don't have nearly my results.

Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

[ QUOTE ]
There is nothing wrong with preflop with this deep money and my position. There are advantages to playing this kind of hand, and a lot of top LAGs will raise it from early position with much shallower money.

[/ QUOTE ]
wtf? werent you just hating on opening J9o on the button? the J9o hand is alot more +ev than this

Re: 63s level 1 WCOOP ME
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There is nothing wrong with preflop with this deep money and my position. There are advantages to playing this kind of hand, and a lot of top LAGs will raise it from early position with much shallower money.

[/ QUOTE ]
wtf? werent you just hating on opening J9o on the button? the J9o hand is alot more +ev than this

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeh, but everyone was saying I was wrong. This is deeper money and my hand is sooted. I really prefer low suited cards to medium unsuited cards with deep money. It is easier to play, because you get more draws you can play strongly and when you just have 6-high, it is easier to throw away or bluff with. Also, it creates more deception, and makes it harder to read whether you hit the flop if you have something like that.

Here, if I raise and call a reraise, I can win a big pot if I hit trips or a straight against a big pair or AK/AQ that connects.