Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

i miss sngs.

when i played like thousands on party at the 55s, i would shove here, while saying to myself stupid reg has to have QQ-AA here. i mean regs just dont limp a wide enough range.

yah i shove AK here all day, but I don't think not shoving is criminal since against regs over enough sngs you can develop pretty reliable ranges for limping/minraising etc esp at later levels

Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

I normally instashove, but here the point is a HUGE read vs poker_in_pb.

I really really like your preflop line but then you confused me on your postflop, why playing so passively?

Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

Sorry but this is a case of a laser read that villain has only QQ+.

If those conditions, shoving seems super bad.

Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

This is QQ+ unless he reads this post and changes. Check it down.

Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

you played that hand as bad as you can imo [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

[ QUOTE ]
you played that hand as bad as you can imo [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

That's constructive.

There's like multiple ways you could mean here.

I guess Im not experienced in playing AK in unraised pots with 10bbs, its like my mouse was gravitating towards the slider to at least bet something. The message is definitely clear though, [censored] poker in pb

Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you played that hand as bad as you can imo [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

That's constructive.

There's like multiple ways you could mean here.

I guess Im not experienced in playing AK in unraised pots with 10bbs, its like my mouse was gravitating towards the slider to at least bet something. The message is definitely clear though, [censored] poker in pb

[/ QUOTE ]

i think the message is clear that nobody likes

poker_dik_head_pb.

i dont think the message is clear to push preflop though.

Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

Against anyone else on earth this is a trivially easy shove. Are we clear on that? But apparently turdboy only does this with monsters. In 15k sngs or so I've never gotten a read like that on someone, but I do believe it here.

Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

[ QUOTE ]
Against anyone else on earth this is a trivially easy shove. Are we clear on that? But apparently turdboy only does this with monsters. In 15k sngs or so I've never gotten a read like that on someone, but I do believe it here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought it was a given that 99.999% of the time this a super clear shove, my main question is what other people thought on if this is a .001% case(and how they would play postflop in that situation), I thought it was at the time. Postflop was very bad as I played it.

Ty for the comments everyone, appreciate it.

Re: $114 really weird hand vs Poker_in_PB
 

if your read was good which a call from those stats seems like a big hand then your call on flop was horrid.

and bet on river was worse....

if you read is that you should check and only pay if A and A alone hits try to check down cheap if K hits