Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
Part Bump - Part Reply......

Nice work Ishmael!! With any luck this post will contribute to a cutback of the many useless "how do my stats look?" and "what should my stats be?" type posts. The best part of your analysis is the presentation of the data giving both an average stat, the min/max stats, and a SD based range. This is a nice proof positive that not everyone needs to have a VP$IP of exactly 17.635%. Yes it's true - player A can win playing 27% of his hands while player B can be sitting across the table and winning as well playing only 13% of his hands.


If we're getting a new sticky post - This thread should be linked!!!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks in general (and praise from you seems tougher to come by than from most [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img])...

I was curious what others think of this:

[ QUOTE ]
If we're getting a new sticky post - This thread should be linked!!!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Because I was thinking about asking for that.

Do you think that it would be a good idea to have this stickied?

(I'm sure the title would be changed... but I was just so angry that he was SOOO close to losing...)

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
Do you think that it would be a good idea to have this stickied?

[/ QUOTE ]

If it stops even one n00b from making a useless "1000k hands stat-checkup" post making this thread sticky will have been +EV for the SS Forum!!

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

Good work. I really like the 1 SD range given on the values. Rebump.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

Sticky a final version of with pretty pictures for lazy noobs or it won't do anyhting to stop the stats posts.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
Big questions:

a) Anything that seems like a typeo?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, "typo" doesn't have an "e" in it. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Great stuff, and a wonderful reminder that everybody has their own style. While TA-A is a good approach, there's wiggle room for adjustments here and there, and it's nice to see that we don't need to scream at newbies "VPIP>20% IST VERBOTEN!"

Thanks for your time and effort.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, "typo" doesn't have an "e" in it. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

The ironing is delicious!

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

Ishmael:

I believe you PMed me about this and I didn't get back to you.

Largely because, well, I don't feel like I have enough hands at either 2/4 or 3/6 to feel remotely confident about my numbers, and I don't think I'm particularly good either.

However, if/when I get more hands, I'll think about sending in some numbers to this project.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

Great work and great post. I'd also like to see win rate and win rate correlations. I'm only 1.5BB/100 on $3/$6 over 22,000 hands, but I will send you my stats if you want them (I can't imagine you do).

Optimal is misspelled.

Jim

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
Great work and great post. I'd also like to see win rate and win rate correlations. I'm only 1.5BB/100 on $3/$6 over 22,000 hands, but I will send you my stats if you want them (I can't imagine you do).

Optimal is misspelled.

Jim

[/ QUOTE ]

Not as ironic a misspelling at typo!

Actually, those stats are fine. It is statistically likely you are not winning by chance.

The link to the other post (with instructions is)

here

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

Interesting analysis. Some histogram plots might further help describe the spread of the data. I'd also be interested in seeing a scatter plot of VPIP vs. W$WSF. If you re-run the analysis, I'd be happy to send you my most recent PT stats.