Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

BZ I find it interesting I completely agree with you in this thread but you laughed at me in the Schneids J9 hand. I feel the hands have some similarities.

-DeathDonkey

Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

[ QUOTE ]
also just to clarify things, against many opponents (those who do peel lightly here, which is about 60% of high stakes palyers) im betting any 2 on the turn

of course if i think my oppt is very tight and will fold this without A high or better then i'll just check behind and hope to spike something

[/ QUOTE ]
Do you mean that if you know your opponent's flop peel means A hi or better, then you check the turn, otherwise you bet the turn with any 2?

Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

yeah basically if my oppt is the type who always has a showdownable hand after calling the flop i just check the turn cuz its a waste to bet IMO

Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

also dont try to play like me its sick high variance. u'll run 5BB/100 for 30K hands then breakeven for 60K hands. i guess its still a good winrate overall but the BE streaks are painful

Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

[ QUOTE ]
also dont try to play like me its sick high variance. u'll run 5BB/100 for 30K hands then breakeven for 60K hands. i guess its still a good winrate overall but the BE streaks are painful

[/ QUOTE ]

??? from the few hundred hands we've played together it seems to me you play pretty much ABC poker. what do you think you do differently than the other tags?

Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
also dont try to play like me its sick high variance. u'll run 5BB/100 for 30K hands then breakeven for 60K hands. i guess its still a good winrate overall but the BE streaks are painful

[/ QUOTE ]

??? from the few hundred hands we've played together it seems to me you play pretty much ABC poker. what do you think you do differently than the other tags?

[/ QUOTE ]


compare my posts in this thread and the other thread with DpRs posts about how bad my logic is haha


also my "thing" is that i bluff a lot, make really big folds, and make really loose calldowns

Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

also im more passive than 90% of TAGs

Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

[ QUOTE ]
BZ I find it interesting I completely agree with you in this thread but you laughed at me in the Schneids J9 hand. I feel the hands have some similarities.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]


DD, the hands have definite similarities, but on one board people fold, and on another board people don't fold.

Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BZ I find it interesting I completely agree with you in this thread but you laughed at me in the Schneids J9 hand. I feel the hands have some similarities.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]


DD, the hands have definite similarities, but on one board people fold, and on another board people don't fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree - people fold on the J9 hand board, so how bad can my turn 3 bet idea be?

-DeathDonkey

Re: Dean Video: Bluff vs Llama
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BZ I find it interesting I completely agree with you in this thread but you laughed at me in the Schneids J9 hand. I feel the hands have some similarities.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]


DD, the hands have definite similarities, but on one board people fold, and on another board people don't fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree - people fold on the J9 hand board, so how bad can my turn 3 bet idea be?

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't know exactly what you're getting at. the reason i think it's bad is because nearly every time he raises that turn he has a either a showdownable hand or a hand that will see the river and you'll be firing a 3BB bluff for a relatively small pot and will be winning it far less than you're supposed to.

on the FLOP however you should be checkraising at least some % because its a hard to hit flop and its also a hard to peel flop, and hes literally betting the flop w/ 100% of his hands. we can't say the same about the turn.

in THIS case the board is much harder to hit and much less likely to scare oppts. literally 90% of players at mid/high stakes go into insta calldown mode when checkraised on this turn. its exploitable but not by bluffing them.

so basically while i agree that the other hand is much more bluffable i think when he raises the turn we're in the same [censored] hole we are in this hand when we raise the turn