Re: Ethics of clogging up high stakes tables
 

[ QUOTE ]
i am really annoyed when there is someone sitting every single table, but then will sit out when anyone sits in against them. all they do is sit there eating up all the tables so the fish is forced to play them. i dont have any problem at all with forcing them to sit out. if they get mad, thats their own fault, they are the ones sitting out, not you. so just jump every single one of their tables and make them look like punks. easy.

[/ QUOTE ]
i play hu lhe, and i do this all the time. it used to work out great, the guy either left or he got angry and tilted and played me

now the other guy will usually play his button and then leave, which puts me on megatilt [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

Re: Ethics of clogging up high stakes tables
 

pokerroom allows anyone to create a table for nearly any game, at nearly any limit. you can also make private games that require a password to sit in. that was pretty sweet. i don't understand why you wouldn't allow players to create their own tables.

Re: Ethics of clogging up high stakes tables
 

All,

"the person who doesn't want to play should be the one who is obligated to get up."

Seems like everyone here pretty much agrees on the obviously correct answer. If you're willing to play, sit at as many tables as you want waiting for all comers. If not, get the f off the table.

Re: Ethics of clogging up high stakes tables
 

I witnessed this. uridanger and perky playing nl 40000. perky agrees to play higher. automatically grimstarr sits down in every nl 60000 table to get perky lol. he does.

Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
 

Re: Ethics of clogging up high stakes tables
 

imo this whole thread is about Grimstarrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

i haven't seen him play a hand at $200/$400 or $300/$600 for over 3 months.... yet he still sits and then sits out.

what a joke of a player. imo - if you're not willing to play MOST of the players at your stakes HU then you shouldn't join an empty tablr - just join when the fish is sitting.

also... what do these guys do when they are sitting out? watch the rail chat about them? pop zits?

Re: Ethics of clogging up high stakes tables
 

[ QUOTE ]
It is extremely lame when there are four or five guys sitting alone at 25-50 heads-up and not one of them will play me or any of the others.

One of these days I will start sitting at every table. Am I bitter? Yes.

[/ QUOTE ]
Game selection is lame?

Re: Ethics of clogging up high stakes tables
 

[ QUOTE ]
Game selection is lame?

[/ QUOTE ]
Only when it's practiced on me.

Re: Ethics of clogging up high stakes tables
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Game selection is lame?

[/ QUOTE ]
Only when it's practiced on me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sounds like it's time to borrow someone else's account.

Or get a new nickname like "noatalma".

Re: Ethics of clogging up high stakes tables
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
one time i sat with kaintd with 677.50.... [censored] it didn't work..

[/ QUOTE ]

he also happens to be the biggest winner in midstakes HU games, coincidence?


[/ QUOTE ]

Kaintd is slightly better than breakeven....far from the biggest winner anywhere.