Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

[ QUOTE ]
They don't only need X>66% equity because of fold equity. And there perceived fold equity certainly is higher due to the fact that someone holds AAA in their hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes but like I said, when colluders are jamming they are either trying to get a fold or trying to get more money in. It can't be both simultaneously.

[ QUOTE ]

Undoubtedly this could be coincidence, but surely your claim that it CANNOT be collusion is assailable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good thing I never made that claim.

Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

[ QUOTE ]
But how does this strangeness suggest collusion?
It's not collusion give me a break.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lol at Stevebets hand

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

pretty sure if he was colluding he would call there instead of fold...

Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But how does this strangeness suggest collusion?
It's not collusion give me a break.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]


Ok that's step 1.

Now quote what you said I said. Then compare.

Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

In formal logic Cannot and it's not are the same statement. An example would include; he cannot be guilty or he's not guilty. It means the same thing. So do yourself a favor and DO NOT reread your statement because your wrong.

Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

At least we know that the online games that high still have their retards.

Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

[ QUOTE ]
pretty sure if he was colluding he would call there instead of fold...

[/ QUOTE ]

This is wrong, as one player has the nut high hand and the second nut low hand, so calling potentially loses them 200 dollars when steve has A2, if they were in fact working together.

Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

[ QUOTE ]
In formal logic Cannot and it's not are the same statement. An example would include; he cannot be guilty or he's not guilty. It means the same thing. So do yourself a favor and DO NOT reread your statement because your wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]


Oh you got me, I forgot that statements on internet message boards should be read as exercises in formal logic rather than by the conventions of standard English usage.

Re: Stevesbets and Tommyboy accuse MadCaddy of cheating (TL;DR)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
pretty sure if he was colluding he would call there instead of fold...

[/ QUOTE ]

This is wrong, as one player has the nut high hand and the second nut low hand, so calling potentially loses them 200 dollars when steve has A2, if they were in fact working together.

[/ QUOTE ]

are u an idiot?
obv it woul,.d be -EV financially, but it would also reduce their exposure of looking like colluders