Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

I'm interested more in the coaching than staking, but the staking is surely part of it so that's fine too. I'd want to do 2/4+ but will play 1/2 under guidance. Been at 1/2 for quite some time. My winrate was 2-3x what it is now until our country celebrated its independence in early July, then it suddenly went down the shitter. So either the games got tough, I got bad, or I just ran bad (lean towards the last one, which led to the 2nd one). I appear to be a decent winner at 1/2 PLO as well, but that is always up for debate...does anyone ever truly know their winrate in that game?? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/9039/ptaj0.jpg

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/2630/graphhz8.jpg

Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

Can we skip the intelligence part if I have enough potential?

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y21...assmuncher.jpg

Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
quality, not quantity!

[/ QUOTE ]
contradictory DUCY

Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

I play at Partypoker/FullTilt/IPoker. My BR management is pretty conservative. I want a stake for NL200.

NL25 = ~ 10k hands
NL50 = ~ 86k hands
NL100 = ~ 41k hands
NL200 = ~ 2k hands

http://www.imagehack.eu/de/uploads/9875e69dd7.jpg

Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

Wow. Nice 45 degree graph.

Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
I play at Partypoker/FullTilt/IPoker. My BR management is pretty conservative. I want a stake for NL200.

NL25 = ~ 10k hands
NL50 = ~ 86k hands
NL100 = ~ 41k hands
NL200 = ~ 2k hands

http://www.imagehack.eu/de/uploads/9875e69dd7.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]

Uhh your roll has to be over $10k, why do you want a stake for $200nl?

Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I play at Partypoker/FullTilt/IPoker. My BR management is pretty conservative. I want a stake for NL200.

NL25 = ~ 10k hands
NL50 = ~ 86k hands
NL100 = ~ 41k hands
NL200 = ~ 2k hands

http://www.imagehack.eu/de/uploads/9875e69dd7.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]

Uhh your roll has to be over $10k, why do you want a stake for $200nl?

[/ QUOTE ]

Are these progressive? It's pretty interesting that your $/100 doesn't seem to go up, but I guess it could be a combination of games getting tougher and moving up in stakes.

Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
i'd take a guy who has 3k posts over 200 posts anyday, even if the guy with 3k posts looks on paper to be a worse player.


[/ QUOTE ]

<---

Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i'd take a guy who has 3k posts over 200 posts anyday, even if the guy with 3k posts looks on paper to be a worse player.


[/ QUOTE ]

<---

[/ QUOTE ]

Woohoo, point that arrow this way too [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: looking to stake people part 3
 

[ QUOTE ]

Uhh your roll has to be over $10k, why do you want a stake for $200nl?

[/ QUOTE ]

Unfortunately I had to cashout most of my winnings because of private reasons and my bankroll right now is only like 4k $ and I don´t think that is enough when 8tabling 200NL. At least I wouldn´t feel comfortable with it. I prefer 50 buyins.


[ QUOTE ]

Are these progressive? It's pretty interesting that your $/100 doesn't seem to go up, but I guess it could be a combination of games getting tougher and moving up in stakes.

[/ QUOTE ]

My winrate doesn´t increase so much because I mix limits when I play. I am looking for soft tables which means that I am sometimes playing 4tables 50NL and 4 of 100NL. Another thing is that I was beating 50NL with like 9ptbb/100 which I think is hard to sustain at 100NL while 8tabling.