Re: that puke taste in my mouth
 

MDMA's point was obvious. Anyone who didnt get what he was saying....

Id lead the river just because the flop check, turn call to me means a gutshot type hand that might have paired the nine such as Q9, 96. Then I would flat call the raise.

Here id probably call but it looks like a fold. You have repped at least a set and hes still moving in. So he wont do this with two pair imo, it needs to be a straight and I agree with whitelime that 67 is pretty rare here.

Re: that puke taste in my mouth
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
yesterday i played a similar pot...rambles about a pot that isn't close to similar.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

hahahhaha. Jma got owned by guy with 80 posts.

Re: that puke taste in my mouth
 

white,

that is actually a good point, and something i would have never considered. i guess mr.6 posts indirectly contributed something useless afterall.

Re: that puke taste in my mouth
 

thanks for the responses.

results: i folded. boring, i know.


my thinking is that my hand looks alot like a set or 67. there is pretty much zero chance he has 99 in my mind. he would just call (assuming he is sane, which he hasnt done anything yet to make me think otherwise) everytime. 67 has GOT to be a large part of my range in his mind, since i called pf, chk'd flop, bet my open ended and then CR'd my straight huge.

but in his mind, if he thinks i might have 99/tt/67 some of the time, he still shouldnt shove 67 for a couple reasons. first off, im not calling a shove with a set, he knows that im sure. second, if he knows i wont call, why would 67 ever shove since i could just as easily have QJ or J7 with the way the hand played out. QJ for me is just as likely as 67.

this hand plays completely differently with say 1500 left. its a close ur eyes and call, since he could be getting silly with 67 or 99.

but in the end, i figured it would have to be quite the parlay for me to have a winner in the end.

Re: that puke taste in my mouth
 

you're puking because you know you have to call