Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Full Ring (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   Another FR Split Poll (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=550139)

kindling 11-19-2007 10:28 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
So 100NL is the red-headed stepchild?

1p0kerboy 11-19-2007 10:36 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
What about letting 100NL post in either forum?

It would be:
2NL-100NL
100NL+

Split Suit 11-19-2007 10:37 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
for the ppl that say "no"...may i ask why?

illini43 11-19-2007 10:39 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
Why don't whoever can control this just do it. If traffic sucks or whatever, you can always just recombine the forums...it seems very simple IMO.

Just pick somewhere to split it (100NL seems to be a good spot - can post in both) and just do it already.

oober 11-19-2007 11:07 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
200 + should be the line. I agree now for the 1st time this should be done.

Albert Moulton 11-19-2007 11:31 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
[ QUOTE ]
One minor subplot of a potential split is where do live hands get posted? Almost all live hand are from 200NL+, but the content level of most live posts seems to be more small stakes type questions.

[/ QUOTE ]

200NL+ live hands should go in the NL 200+ forum because trying to have some kind of split that is NL200+ on line but NL500+ live would be difficult to communicate and enforce.

Maybe that's a good reason to make the split at NL 200+ since most live 1/2 games have a $100 buy-in. That would mean the live split would be 1/2 and 2/2 NL $100 in the lower forum, and 1/2 and 2/2 NL $200+ buy-in in the higher forum. But if the split was NL$100 then you'd end up with some posts from live 1/2 and 2/2 NL$100 games that play a lot like NL$10 on-line.

As for the post quality, the live posters in the higher forum would just run the risk of the usual "you suck" feedback. But I bet there wouldn't be very much of that in the higher forum since there just aren't that many live game posters even if the few you read don't measure up to your expectations.

TheProdigy 11-19-2007 11:34 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
Yea, 100nl+ as much as I hate to say it :P

vizer02 11-19-2007 11:37 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
Who has the ability to do this, and why hasn't it been split already? I know I don't open up hardly any NL50 and under threads to reply to; maybe it's selfish but I'm looking for upper level advice, theory, and hand postings when I come to the FR forum, and usually it's just not here. The regs from higher levels would seem to benefit more from the advice at MSNL because of this.

LifeTilt 11-19-2007 11:41 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
100nl should be the split point its got a lot of very good players that i fear

[/ QUOTE ]

100nl is a fishtank. the only difference is that the regulars at 100nl are much better than the regs at 50nl. But there are just so many fish it's not even relevant

[/ QUOTE ]


I don't ever comment much about this, so here is my two cents. First, I have played 500k+ hands at NL100 and ~200k hands at NL200. They are completely different games. Despite wanting to be with the big boys, the advice/thoughts a NL100 player might give/have just does not measure up to some of the more advanced concepts that a NL200+ utilizes in his or her play.

xxrod17xx 11-19-2007 11:50 PM

Re: Another FR Split Poll
 
I added to 200NL+ but wow this is a close race


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.