Re: 25NL - limp/shove by idiot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] AA, KK, AKs [/ QUOTE ] Why AKs but not QQ? [/ QUOTE ] I probably do it with QQ, also. But I think his range is more heavily weighted towards better hands, of which KK is one of them. If we have QQ, we're a 20/80 dog to KK, but AKs is only like a 2:1 dog. |
Re: 25NL - limp/shove by idiot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] AA, KK, AKs [/ QUOTE ] Why AKs but not QQ? [/ QUOTE ] I probably do it with QQ, also. But I think his range is more heavily weighted towards better hands, of which KK is one of them. If we have QQ, we're a 20/80 dog to KK, but AKs is only like a 2:1 dog. [/ QUOTE ] Ah yes, but QQ is much better vs. AA than AK is vs. AA, which balances out AK being better again KK than QQ against KK: Pre-flop Wins Ties Equity 79.83% 0.54% 80.36% ( AA,KK ) 19.10% 0.54% 19.64% ( AK ) Pre-flop Wins Ties Equity 81.52% 0.22% 81.74% ( AA,KK ) 18.03% 0.22% 18.26% ( QQ ) Edit: And QQ is much better against the lower end of his range, so if you're calling with AK you should definitely be calling with QQ. |
Re: 25NL - limp/shove by idiot
I reckon he's got AJ+ here and is losing the plot a bit.
I call with QQ+ AK+. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.