Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

hmmmmm well if he knows you play draws like this, i like it... cuz based on his line his range is most likely TT-KK... that 9 kinda scares the [censored] outta me though

Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

i also think his hand range is stronger than TT-KK he could be check/calling tricky style

Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

why is the ace a bad card for his hand? cant he easily have any of a number of big aces here? or do you expect him to fire again on turn with those hands?

i think an ace is just as likely as a big pair, and similarly, i think your shove is a great play as a range merge to sometimes get big aces to fold and sometimes get looked up by underpairs

Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

[ QUOTE ]
my only issue is that most of your hands that lose to KK-10,10 either raise the flop or check behind turn. You are over repping this a lot which may seriously detract from the value you are getting from this shove.

[/ QUOTE ]

My thoughts exactly...

Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

fwiw this deep I'm often flatting the flop with draws

Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

How light does Peachy look you up? Versus a lot of players I like this shove on the river a lot.

Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

i think its cool. u get ownd sometimes, but u own him more.

Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

vv good.

Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

[ QUOTE ]
fwiw this deep I'm often flatting the flop with draws

[/ QUOTE ]
this is why i like it

Re: 50/100 deep vs peachy, thin value?
 

Doesn't pf get aggressive enough that you're peeling flop with AJ+ sometimes?

Also I think he might c/f or b/f TT-KK on the turn just to avoid a river headache. Its also a perfect board to throw rope with an ace, even though from what I can tell Peachy is a value-monger.