Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   Puke (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=546532)

Nielsio 11-15-2007 01:09 AM

Re: Puke
 
I've seen villains do this with AT or similar hands. But I doubt it's > 19% in this case.

Panthro 11-15-2007 01:10 AM

Re: Puke
 
Fold and I've learnt my lesson the hard way about river c/shoves from unknowns.

pineapple888 11-15-2007 01:12 AM

Re: Puke
 
[ QUOTE ]
this board is pretty dry, I can see villain slowplaying a set here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. I'd really think about the bet sizing here because he's either going to have something weak (and we want to keep him in), or have us crushed (and we lose less). Less on turn, less on river, then it's an easy fold to a raise.

jk3a 11-15-2007 01:17 AM

Re: Puke
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this board is pretty dry, I can see villain slowplaying a set here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. I'd really think about the bet sizing here because he's either going to have something weak (and we want to keep him in), or have us crushed (and we lose less). Less on turn, less on river, then it's an easy fold to a raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

I strongly disagree with betting less.

markuisis 11-15-2007 01:17 AM

Re: Puke
 
[ QUOTE ]
this board is pretty dry, I can see villain slowplaying a set here.

[/ QUOTE ]

by the turn the board is not very dry and most villains will raise sets there id say instead of going into the river oop with a lot of possible ugly cards and no idea where ur at.

loosbastard 11-15-2007 01:17 AM

Re: Puke
 
[ QUOTE ]
[
Agreed. I'd really think about the bet sizing here because he's either going to have something weak (and we want to keep him in), or have us crushed (and we lose less). Less on turn, less on river, then it's an easy fold to a raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree. Bet sizing is perfect IMO.

pineapple888 11-15-2007 01:57 AM

Re: Puke
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[
Agreed. I'd really think about the bet sizing here because he's either going to have something weak (and we want to keep him in), or have us crushed (and we lose less). Less on turn, less on river, then it's an easy fold to a raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree. Bet sizing is perfect IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

Huh. Nice to see everybody giving their reasoning.

Read the post's title. Think a bit about what it means when you get yourself in that spot.

Or not, what do I care.

pineapple888 11-15-2007 01:58 AM

Re: Puke
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this board is pretty dry, I can see villain slowplaying a set here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. I'd really think about the bet sizing here because he's either going to have something weak (and we want to keep him in), or have us crushed (and we lose less). Less on turn, less on river, then it's an easy fold to a raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

I strongly disagree with betting less.

[/ QUOTE ]

You wouldn't happen to have any actual reasons?

tufat23 11-15-2007 02:01 AM

Re: Puke
 
sigh and fold. its really hard tho.


sometimes i like to rotate the mouse in a circle really fast between the two and jsut close my eyes and click, although sometimes i then miss and click another table [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Jay Riall 11-15-2007 02:01 AM

Re: Puke
 
[ QUOTE ]
sigh and fold. its really hard tho

[/ QUOTE ]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.