Re: Thoughts and results...
 

[ QUOTE ]

So you approve of UTG limp with A9s?


[/ QUOTE ]

At a loose-passive table, I'll limp UTG with hands as bad as ATo, A7s, KJo, 77, maybe QJs if I can expect lots of cold-callers.

Re: Thoughts and results...
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

So you approve of UTG limp with A9s?


[/ QUOTE ]

At a loose-passive table, I'll limp UTG with hands as bad as ATo, A7s, KJo, 77, maybe QJs if I can expect lots of cold-callers.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Ok semi-loose 9-handed. Aggressive table, but not tricky. Only *** of 5 stars. There is a Pro to my right who to my knowledge has logged well over a thousand hours at 20/40.

[/ QUOTE ]

It wasn't that loose, and certainly wasn't passive. I almost universally reject ATo, A7s and KJo UTG full ring. I limp 77 if I expect a lot of limpers and QJs is really iffy...maybe under ideal circumstances.

I'm certainly no authority on pre-flop standards. But I guess it appears I play too tight from early position and really, really laggy from CO/HJ...at least by 2+2 standards.

Garland

Re: Thoughts and results...
 

[ QUOTE ]
It wasn't that loose, and certainly wasn't passive. I almost universally reject ATo, A7s and KJo UTG full ring. I limp 77 if I expect a lot of limpers and QJs is really iffy...maybe under ideal circumstances.

I'm certainly no authority on pre-flop standards. But I guess it appears I play too tight from early position and really, really laggy from CO/HJ...at least by 2+2 standards.


[/ QUOTE ]

The offsuited stuff ATo, KJo, I agree, toss it. It depends on the PF table conditions, but in many of the PF limp fests that you might get at Commerce or FW's, QJs, Axs, medium pairs are certainly playable.

And if you're going to play AJo, raise it.