Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

average around 70 [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] and thats all the turbos included

Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

worse than I remembered then, jesus.

Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

any way that the tables could be made resizable? the full sized are too big, the miniview too small.

Also, what are the alternatives for ipoker (as sites based on within the EU)?

Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

Which skins are iPoker? Excuse my ignorance, Titan is one yes? What others?

Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

hansa poker, noiq....

Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

noble also.

i played on titan back at 25c/50c. unbelieveably bad quality of opposition.

now i play at party though for some reason, although i saw someone above saying that 1/2 isn't that soft atm, so i'm not too keen on switching back

Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

ive been playing ipoker for quite a while now and the games seem to have been getting steadily nittyier since the merger, alot more multi tabling nits and a few more good regs. still definatley beatable but not like it was.sigh.

Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

Take cashback instead of FPPs. The ratio for the boutique isnt good at all. its like 1000:18

And the NL200 on iPoker is really soft. I have no clue what you're talking about. The difference between NL200 and NL400 is huge only because NL400 is full of decent-ok regs and nits and most of NL200 regs arent good at all.

Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

[ QUOTE ]
Take cashback instead of FPPs. The ratio for the boutique isnt good at all. its like 1000:18

And the NL200 on iPoker is really soft. I have no clue what you're talking about. The difference between NL200 and NL400 is huge only because NL400 is full of decent-ok regs and nits and most of NL200 regs arent good at all.

[/ QUOTE ]
x2 for the use of FPPs, ratio proposed by theplux seems a good approximation! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Also have to agree that NL200 is quite soft except for some regulars that I have no clue when it comes to play against 'em

Good regulars so far:

Theplux as well (plays pretty solid game)
martinelli (seems to play randomly but is up on my database)
SnakeSanders (god I hate him, probably the best player on NL200 so far, I think he can read through my soul)
ThsMnSNthng2Me or something like that seems pretty solid too
NoBrainerReraise is also quite up on my DB and was very aggro when he sat at my tables but he also had an indecent rush of good cards...so I'm not sure if he's good or not.

Re: ***iPoker Regs Thread***
 

I have played a lot of 100NL in the past week and i'm pretty sure there isn't a single good regular, maybe 4-5 who aren't completely brain dead. Agree?

I find the games extremely different from party, cause of large rakeback % there are a huge amount of breakeven grinders at 100NL, compared to party where there are less reg's, but they are much better.

P.S i'm pretty sure that iPoker is way more rigged than other sites :P