Re: sorta brag, sorta cry for help
 

[ QUOTE ]
The avg player at 6m is pretty good now imo even at 10 games. I would not be surprised if even the best players had only a 1BB winrate over 200K+ samples. I don't table select much tho -- and that is probably more important now than ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

well...surprise.

and no im not talking about myself.

Re: sorta brag, sorta cry for help
 

what's your standard deviation per 100 hands for HU play?

Re: sorta brag, sorta cry for help
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The avg player at 6m is pretty good now imo even at 10 games. I would not be surprised if even the best players had only a 1BB winrate over 200K+ samples. I don't table select much tho -- and that is probably more important now than ever.

[/ QUOTE ]


well...surprise.

and no im not talking about myself.

[/ QUOTE ]


at 10/20 games? Where the rake accounts for 1.5bb/100? And filtered for 6 handed? Cause I would be surprised too. It's easy when you factor in hu.

Re: sorta brag, sorta cry for help
 

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...page=&vc=1

solid_p doesn't play higher than 10/20 i believe.

edit - rather, he does, but that first graph is pretty conclusive.

Re: sorta brag, sorta cry for help
 

[ QUOTE ]
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...page=&vc=1

solid_p doesn't play higher than 10/20 i believe.

edit - rather, he does, but that first graph is pretty conclusive.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude...a huge part of that graph was from the old party days