Re: What % are winning players?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Easy to solve.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is like having a pole on the inside of a football stadium asking whether or not the person likes football.

[/ QUOTE ]

Big error IMO to assume the majority of 2p2ers are winning players.

I've also heard polls work better for that kind of thing.

[/ QUOTE ]

A) I didn't say the majority of 2+2's are winners, just higher percentage than non 2+2's maybe?

B) You've been here since 04' don't know teh correct spelling of pole? What a moran.

http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g1...el95/LEVEL.jpg

Re: What % are winning players?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Easy to solve.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is like having a pole on the inside of a football stadium asking whether or not the person likes football.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you mean Polish football?

Re: What % are winning players?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Easy to solve.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is like having a pole on the inside of a football stadium asking whether or not the person likes football.

[/ QUOTE ]

Big error IMO to assume the majority of 2p2ers are winning players.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would imagine the vast majority of 2p2ers are winning players. They just arent a winning player at the level they play at.

Re: What % are winning players?
 

I was a losing player for a long time.
I finally started this up swing for over 2 years now.

Re: What % are winning players?
 

i dont even use pokertracker anymore, but i had a pretty decent sized database of hands, and according to it a little over 60% were losers.

Re: What % are winning players?
 

I am winning player but not a $50/hour winning player. More like 50 cents an hour.

Re: What % are winning players?
 

sharkscope says about 1/3 of players are longterm winners at SnGs. wouldn't it probably be similar at all forms of poker?

Re: What % are winning players?
 

40% winners and 60% loosers in my pokertracker

Re: What % are winning players?
 

~5% according to a high ranking PS official.

Re: What % are winning players?
 

databases are not a good measure.


if you have 100 hands against a -1BB/100 loser; the chances of him being up is not far from 50%. if that same player plays 100k hands, the chances are close to zero.


in a random 250k hand database of mine, ill only have > 1k hands against a tiny fraction of the people in there. and when i do have >10k hands against someone, it's almost always because they're also playing professionally.