Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

it's so much better with aJ

Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

do you ever make this play with AA, AT, or a 3?

Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

id rather 3bet with KT here

anyone like calling the flop c/r ?

Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

ye, if also prefer calling and shoving the turn.

Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

You have no read that his donk is a weak/ probe bet. He is killing it over a small sample. There is a diamond draw out which if he has he is probably moving in on you and yet the only options I am hearing are float and bluff turn or bluff flop which looks more like a bluff than anything else. I like a fold here on the flop until I know what a donk from him means.

Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

[ QUOTE ]
id rather 3bet with KT here

anyone like calling the flop c/r ?

[/ QUOTE ]

Only if he isn't that likely to fire the turn again and we can pick up the pot there.

Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

[ QUOTE ]
do you ever make this play with AA, AT, or a 3?

[/ QUOTE ]

not really an issue at this point since there is no history. the issue is whether he thinks you would.

Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

also probably a good flop to check with this particular hand.

Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
id rather 3bet with KT here

anyone like calling the flop c/r ?

[/ QUOTE ]

Only if he isn't that likely to fire the turn again and we can pick up the pot there.

[/ QUOTE ]
well duhhhhh, but all we know is that hes unknown

Re: bluffing with no reads or history
 

i think a flop check may be kinda standard
but w/e that doesnt really matter...

if my read was that he can let this go i think i would float the CR-but either way this gets kinda gross-which is why i think i ilke a flop check