Re: BB/100
 

10+ tabling is not standard for midstakes cash game play. also if you have a 6+ winrate 10 tabling, you are a midstakes god... to answer the original question, if you can have a winrate between 2-4 you are doing well.

Re: BB/100
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I consider multitabling 10+ tables

[/ QUOTE ]

haha

what are your thoughts on polygamy?

[/ QUOTE ]


[ QUOTE ]
yeah i was loling at multi tabling being defined at 10+ tables too. jesus god man. i know plenty of people do it, but i don't think its at all standard.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol. how many tables do most of you guys play these days, I still play 11-12, my MT ratio is above 9.5, I thought that was still pretty much the norm....

Re: BB/100
 

1) I want to see a 450K sample of someone running at 6ptbb 10 tabling or it's not possible.
2) people move up before then
3) is it possible though?
4) yeah, I'll bet you I could do it.
5) ok I'll need an escrow, and it would have to be big enough to be worth my while
6) f that. Who cares.

Re: BB/100
 

[ QUOTE ]

lol. how many tables do most of you guys play these days, I still play 11-12, my MT ratio is above 9.5, I thought that was still pretty much the norm....

[/ QUOTE ]

it isn't and never has been.

Re: BB/100
 

abreu vnh

Re: BB/100
 

could start a new thread to ask on the average multi table ratio for good winning poker players (4BB/100) [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: BB/100
 

[ QUOTE ]
abreu vnh

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: BB/100
 

1.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
abreu vnh

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

2. 4-6, if you are asking this you should be happy with 2-4 though

Re: BB/100
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

lol. how many tables do most of you guys play these days, I still play 11-12, my MT ratio is above 9.5, I thought that was still pretty much the norm....

[/ QUOTE ]

it isn't and never has been.

[/ QUOTE ]

I sure thought it was back on party when the games were softer and everyone was running @ 6+....

Re: BB/100
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
6

[/ QUOTE ]

6 is pretty [censored] good in this day and age. Seabeast is the only person I've seen post proof of running @ 6 while multitabling over a large sample (I consider multitabling 10+ tables). I'm sure there are a couple others but they're few and far between. 4 is very solid for 12 tabling.

[/ QUOTE ]

12 tabling seems like a bad idea. Also, I have 5.7ptbb over 100k hands w/n lsat 4 months. 6 is def doable