Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

[ QUOTE ]
I fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am schocked to see u say that. Isn't shoving +ev?

Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

[ QUOTE ]
I fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree and I appreciate you posting here more lately Curtains.

Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

def fold.

Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

I hate these situations too. For people saying fold how high would the pair have to be for us to shove? What about raise?

Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges?

Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

66 def raise, ehh 55 prob raise, 44 prob fold.

Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

[ QUOTE ]
snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges?

[/ QUOTE ]

i havn't done any calcs or anything so i dunno if it's unexploitable, but it doesn't need to be unexploitable to be +ev.

Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

[ QUOTE ]
66 def raise, ehh 55 prob raise, 44 prob fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

open folding 44 here is absurdly weak tight

Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

Fold. And I disagree with you, djk, folding 44 here is fine too. Raising it is straight up bad and open shoving, though marginally +EV, is ridiculously high variance and something we should avoid. It's taken me a looooong time to realize this.

Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
 

damn i did that wrong