Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
 

value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
 

[ QUOTE ]
value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]


I think 200 would do the trick

Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]


I think 200 would do the trick

[/ QUOTE ]

what trick is that? the trick im trying is to get all his money by overbet shoving a marginal hand for value. a 200 bet simply will not accomplish this [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

of course i like 200-250 more as he is much more likely to call with worse. but meh, i was thinking itd be a cool hand to post in the MSNL thread if he got called by T9 or something. and i did say it was more for fun than anything.

Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
 

[ QUOTE ]
This is not thin, this is standard......not betting here vs this guy is criminal.

[/ QUOTE ]


I thought so too. I showed this hand to a couple 2+2er friends over MSN, and both of them were doubting the value of a bet.

I agree with everyone that I should have made it a little bigger!

Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
 

AK didn't get there. so shove!

Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
 

[ QUOTE ]
value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

sick fun indeed! I still think 200ish is more profitable since he folds a lot more to a shove, but the few times that he calls and mucks to a shove here makes shoving awesome in a feeding your ego kind of way.

Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
 

shove