Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Micro Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=71)
-   -   Stack off with bottom set, right? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=520281)

senorquinn 10-10-2007 10:38 PM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
on a TT-99,77,T9,87,97 range you are ahead. So if that is accurate than I agree with the push.

bige321786 10-10-2007 10:39 PM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I stack on flop 100%, but I might not shove $60 over his $8 raise.

Might raise to $36 and shove any turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

The pot was 3-handed. The BB check raised to $60, I simply pushed all in for a small amount more.

Getting aggression numbers now but I remember that he seemed like a competent TAG from his stats, and I had only been at the table for maybe 10-15 hands.

bige321786 10-10-2007 10:43 PM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
Villain was 27.12/11.86/1.21/59.
Flop aggression: 3.00
Turn aggression: 4.00
River aggression: 0.00

Pretty small sample size obviously.

bsball8806 10-10-2007 10:44 PM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
[ QUOTE ]
on a TT-99,77,T9,87,97 range you are ahead. So if that is accurate than I agree with the push.

[/ QUOTE ]

10 10 or 99, yes.
he can't have 77
he doesn't have 87 or 97, (OP said he was a tag, and i highly doubt a tag slowplays and c/raises bottom 2 or pair/straight draw when faced with a bet and a reraise)

So guess what we've narrowed it down to? 10 10, 99, and J8.
We're not ahead of that range.

bsball8806 10-10-2007 10:45 PM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
oh, and i suppose maybe 109s, though MUCH more likely a set or straight

bige321786 10-10-2007 10:45 PM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Villain was 27.12/11.86/1.21/59.
Flop aggression: 3.00
Turn aggression: 4.00
River aggression: 0.00

Pretty small sample size obviously.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe not quite a competent TAG.

Schiester 10-10-2007 10:52 PM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
thanks for post. really interesting to think about.

I'm giving him credit for not limping JJ-AA in multiway pot pf.

He's probably not doing this w 8 outs (99) following 2 aggro players... your not likely to fold flop.

He looks like he's most likely on 99, possibly TT/J9s.

100% equity or close enough. That sucks.

ICMoney 10-10-2007 10:58 PM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
Yeah, I read HH wrong. After he pushes I snap call.

defence18 10-11-2007 02:08 AM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
Seems like some people still want to call. Did I miss something? What could the money possibly have gone in with on that flop that you can beat?

cashstrapped 10-11-2007 05:09 AM

Re: Stack off with bottom set, right?
 
Im getting it in here too.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.