Re: Razztober hand I played OK v Prax
 

[ QUOTE ]
Please just tell me it wasn't me.

[/ QUOTE ]
You were at the other table. I could go look it up again, I guess. .....

OK, Seat 1 Aquarius
Seat 2 Shmohawk
Seat 3 Daomonk
Seat 4 aMurderofCrows
Seat 5 Michio

You know, I don't think the bet was so terrible, we both had a pair, so technically his hand was best at that moment. Aquarius had been seen to play bricks in the hole - I might be guilty of same on very rare occaisions ::cough:: so he wanted to put on some pressure and see what happened, I imagine. He got out pretty fast, then.

Re: Razztober hand I played OK v Prax
 

If either of you has 2 good cards in the hole he's not in good shape. If you both do he's in awful shape. And yeah, at least he had the good sense to not compound the problem and he folded.

3rd st is a little hinky also... Assuming he had 2 babies in the hole it's a bot of a weird call with a complete and a call.

Re: Razztober hand I played OK v Prax
 

[ QUOTE ]
If either of you has 2 good cards in the hole he's not in good shape. If you both do he's in awful shape. And yeah, at least he had the good sense to not compound the problem and he folded.

3rd st is a little hinky also... Assuming he had 2 babies in the hole it's a bot of a weird call with a complete and a call.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not saying he's in good shape here, I'm just saying that a b/f here for 1 more SB is very odd. Looks like it was a bet for information... the kind of info he could have gotten by checking instead.

Re: Razztober hand I played OK v Prax
 

I think a bet/fold is weird too. What did he think was going to happen? If there's a completion and a call, there is no way that both of them have a 2-card hand (and he does).