Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Sports Betting (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=42)
-   -   Daliman's Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4 (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=512142)

TomCowley 09-30-2007 12:43 AM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
If you have the option of RRing 3-teamers at +180 and 2-teamers @-110, it's better to do just the 3-teamers. The opposite is true for 2-teamers @+100.

greg44 09-30-2007 01:59 AM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
I'd consider Atlanta and New York to your collection. Definitely sharp money on these picks. I also added Detroit cuz they're 2.5 at pinnacle.

Actually, I thinkt they're all at 2.5 now. Like I said above the sharp money is on all these sides.

Daliman 09-30-2007 02:36 AM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
[ QUOTE ]
So are you doing 2-teamers, 3-team round-robin and 4-team round-robins?

[/ QUOTE ]

RR'ing, just 2 teamers. My guy doesn't do 3 teamers for 6 point teases.

Daliman 09-30-2007 02:38 AM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd consider Atlanta and New York to your collection. Definitely sharp money on these picks. I also added Detroit cuz they're 2.5 at pinnacle.

Actually, I thinkt they're all at 2.5 now. Like I said above the sharp money is on all these sides.

[/ QUOTE ]
I like ATL better than NYG, and may add that in too. Will let you guys know.

fleece_me 09-30-2007 03:07 AM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
The Giants clearly qualify. Not sure why they aren't included other than they suck

MrG 09-30-2007 07:09 AM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
Are these prices good.
5 teamer 100 pays 450
4 teamers 100 pays 280

Thanks

thing85 09-30-2007 10:02 AM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
[ QUOTE ]
Are these prices good.
5 teamer 100 pays 450
4 teamers 100 pays 280

Thanks

[/ QUOTE ]

Your 4 teamer is only paying +280 but I believe +300 is widely available.

Daliman 09-30-2007 11:27 AM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
[ QUOTE ]
The Giants clearly qualify. Not sure why they aren't included other than they suck

[/ QUOTE ]
No, they don't I have them at +3, and many other books do too.

I tease ALL true Wongs via my books line for this trial.

hogua 09-30-2007 12:08 PM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The Giants clearly qualify. Not sure why they aren't included other than they suck

[/ QUOTE ]
No, they don't I have them at +3, and many other books do too.

I tease ALL true Wongs via my books line for this trial.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the market (i.e vast majority of books, including the sharp books) have the Giants at +2.5. Why not teast then at you book and get a half a point on the tease for free?

Thremp 09-30-2007 12:13 PM

Re: Daliman\'s Wong teasers, Season Deux: Week 4
 
I have:

Atlanta
Detroit
49ers
Giants
Patriots

Vikings have moved out of the realm (obv if your book can get your through the 7 thats fine and gains a small amount of expectation from a bad line)

I fully expect Vikings to cover and Giants to not since that is what happens despite Daliman's accusations.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.