Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=507711)

Colombo 09-23-2007 07:28 PM

Re: simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check)
 
folding here seems horrendous.

Unknown Soldier 09-23-2007 07:36 PM

Re: simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check)
 
[ QUOTE ]
folding here seems horrendous.

[/ QUOTE ]

isnt this as std baluga spot? (mis-applying blanket statemtn?) fwiw im not a very experienced player.

Colombo 09-23-2007 07:37 PM

Re: simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
folding here seems horrendous.

[/ QUOTE ]

isnt this as std baluga spot? (mis-applying blanket statemtn?) fwiw im not a very experienced player.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, baluga is when you get checkraised, and I'm not a believer in it anyway. I just think you bet the perfect amount for him to shove over with a wide range of weaker holdings, so I would hate a fold.

Unknown Soldier 09-23-2007 07:41 PM

Re: simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I just think you bet the perfect amount for him to shove over with a wide range of weaker holdings

[/ QUOTE ]

why do you think that?

Colombo 09-23-2007 07:45 PM

Re: simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I just think you bet the perfect amount for him to shove over with a wide range of weaker holdings

[/ QUOTE ]

why do you think that?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's just a comfortable size, you know? He has FE and at the same time its not an overbet.

Unknown Soldier 09-23-2007 07:47 PM

Re: simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check)
 
ok, thanks for your thoughts.

Nick Royale 09-23-2007 08:11 PM

Re: simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm also running bad ATM, so I also want to do a sanity check: if he raise flop to $160, what's our play?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not folding vs this guy if he raises the flop. I either just bomb the flop or crai turn (non h).

[/ QUOTE ]


1.5 is reasonably passive, no?


[/ QUOTE ]
No not really. But in general I think 40/15/1.5ish players are tricky enough for us not being able to fold this hand. There's very few hands we're behind (6 combos of sets basically) and this is a flop that's good to bluff with air. I think this is a fd, bluff or even a worse Qx enough to not being able to fold this. It's just a question about how to get it in imo.

If you have a decent sample and he's having a low raise c-bet I'm letting it go though. With the info given I'm not.

Laetus 09-24-2007 03:53 AM

Re: simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm also running bad ATM, so I also want to do a sanity check: if he raise flop to $160, what's our play?

[/ QUOTE ]
default: call, check turn.
nitty: fold
super aggro image war: shove

[/ QUOTE ]
Say we call, villain bet 2/3 pot on a blank turn, what's our play? C/C or just CRAI? I would prefer CRAI.

BobboFitos 09-24-2007 08:58 AM

Re: simple hand. fold here, yeah? (running bad, sanity check)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm also running bad ATM, so I also want to do a sanity check: if he raise flop to $160, what's our play?

[/ QUOTE ]
default: call, check turn.
nitty: fold
super aggro image war: shove

[/ QUOTE ]
Say we call, villain bet 2/3 pot on a blank turn, what's our play? C/C or just CRAI? I would prefer CRAI.

[/ QUOTE ]
me too


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.