Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question.

[/ QUOTE ]

That was the 2nd time they brought it up in the show.

The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 to which he obviously said they were only concerned with Buffalo right now.

[/ QUOTE ]

He should have just said, "Of course we can go 16-0." Just to see if he can be more hated than he is right now.

Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
 

pats are going 16-0, i am calling it right now

me and ESPN are totally right

Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
 

[ QUOTE ]
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Giants and the Pats are working on answering the question.

Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated NE
 

[ QUOTE ]
The season is 2 weeks old and ESPN just led off NFL by asking if the Pats can go undefeated. Even for ESPN, this is astonishingly absurd.

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't this more along the lines of maintaining their standards?

Since when has ESPN raised the bar from the gutter they've been in?

b

Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
 

[ QUOTE ]


The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0

[/ QUOTE ]

and people wonder why Barry Bonds is a dick to the media

jesus most sportswriters have a 100stupid to 1legit question ratio

Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
 

I really don't understand why anyone other than a 12 year old kid would watch ESPN other than the actual games broadcasted on the station.

Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0

[/ QUOTE ]

and people wonder why Barry Bonds is a dick to the media

jesus most sportswriters have a 100stupid to 1legit question ratio

[/ QUOTE ]

Barry Bonds is a dick in general and it has nothing to do with the media.

Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Giants and the Pats are working on answering the question.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do the Falcons get a game against a high school team?

Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0

[/ QUOTE ]

and people wonder why Barry Bonds is a dick to the media

jesus most sportswriters have a 100stupid to 1legit question ratio

[/ QUOTE ]

Barry Bonds is a dick in general and it has nothing to do with the media.

[/ QUOTE ]

curious, rough estimate on the number of minutes you have spent talking to Barry Bonds

or examples of dickish things he has done to you, or someone you know well

Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
 

I heard CNN already announced the outcome of the 2008 election.


And by CNN, I of course mean Diebold...