Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

I get a big kick out of Layne. I don't find him annoying at all. He doesn't sit there for 10 minutes hiding behind giant sunglasses trying to figure out if he's going to call a flop raise all-in with bottom pair no redraw. His actions are quick and decisive and his table talk is entertaining.

Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Layne Flack is like the male version of Vanessa Rousso.

[/ QUOTE ]qft
Anybody notice TJ's "online poker is rigged" jab? He must be the unluckiest man alive...

[/ QUOTE ]

when he plays the the come line at craps, this is where bad luck is.

mike matusow will argue strongly he is the unluckiest player. he has stated that he is down millions online.

i agree that fergurson going bust with 99 was a marginal call. perhaps hes trying to mix it up.

Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

Seidel will win. Flack is not annoying. Why does doyle show up if he's always disinterested. Ferguson going broke with 9s...yeah...

Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Why does doyle show up if he's always disinterested.

[/ QUOTE ]
free stake + free steak

Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

Flack was fun to watch, Hellmuth said it best when he said that Flack could handle him at the table better than anyone else

Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

Doyle will win.

Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can't believe Ferguson went broke with 99 that early.

[/ QUOTE ]

He also claimed he was getting 2:1 to call Doyle's shove, but he wasn't. He started the hand with about 14k, and his initial raise was to 2,900, so he was getting about 17:11 by my count; I think the graphics showed him facing a 12k raise into a pot of 17.9k, so pretty much the same thing -- 3:2 at best, certainly not 2:1.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was shocked that he called. Of all people he should know that you don't need to get involved in big pots early in PAD. And what was up with his interview with Shana after the hand? It looked like he was tweaking.

Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

Flack needs to stop smiling, his teeth look like a horses mouth.

Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

[ QUOTE ]
I get a big kick out of Layne. I don't find him annoying at all. He doesn't sit there for 10 minutes hiding behind giant sunglasses trying to figure out if he's going to call a flop raise all-in with bottom pair no redraw. His actions are quick and decisive and his table talk is entertaining.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well said. Flack is okay in my book.

Re: Poker After Dark thread (Bracelet Winners - Monday)
 

Ferguson floored me with that call, too.

Flack is absolutely not in the same category as Vanessa. She is uber annoying, with her "I know all the math!" At every opp. she's like "60-40" or "12 percent", and she wouldn't even be right half of the time (not exactly right- I guess I can be a nit) she was just using the 4x rule on the flop and the 2x rule on the turn, it got really annoying really fast.

Flack's table talk is actually interesting and he seems like a fun guy to play with. And he clearly is a no limit hold em expert (like the rest of the table). Definately a great episode.