Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

[ QUOTE ]
why didnt u just shove the turn wtf?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because it's infinitely better when villain misses and then folds. Matt Flynn explains this well in his new book but this hand does an incredible job of demonstrating how the concept applies in the real world.

Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

[ QUOTE ]
why didnt u just shove the turn wtf?

[/ QUOTE ]

Then he couldnt bet the river ldo

Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

i know BBV isnt for strategy, but a very reputable 2+2er suggests i check to induce a bluff.....yea/nea?

Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

you just cost yourself a quorter

Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

shameless bump for the evening crew

Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

A+, would read again

Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

Would be nice if you can show just one card.

Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

way to pump up the rake, fish

Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

So good.

Re: 1968 to 1 (always leave yourself enough to run a river bluff)
 

A hand like this comes down to your supreme ability to not misclick versus his ability to not misclick. You have a hand where better hands always call if theyre thinking, so you need to exploit him in other ways.

If you're focussed on one table and had a very secure internet connection, i'd leave myself the extra quarter to bluff the river in case he's multi tabling and isnt paying close attention.

If you're on 6+ tables or you occasionally suffer from timeouts (and are out of disconnect protects), you should shove it in asap.

So glad that i play the minbet and dont have to deal with deep, sophisticated strategies like this.


Id you had 65s then you should leave yourself with that extra quarter for sure, in the rare event he has a shittier high card and doesnt want to embarass himself calling 8 high, or whatever.