Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

uh yeah --- 0 Kudos.

Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

Nick = 100% gimmick

Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

[ QUOTE ]
Nick = 100% gimmick

[/ QUOTE ]

there's just no way. no one could put this much time into a gimmick. in fact one of the people i thought most likely to be responsible for vegasnick was lurker.

Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

FREE VEGASNICK

Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

0 kudos

Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

wow nick is a douche. I'm totally not coming to his HUUUUDGE PARTY!

Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

Who even is VegasNick? Is he a good poker player? All I hear about him is how much he sucks, so why do people check his blog all the time?

I also love how he says lol at people caring all of a sudden, and then rips them and calls them maggots, except at the end saying im not trying to make lurker feel bad. kinda hypocritical.

Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

notice his 117 friends... ZERO are real.
u have to put in alot of time to be 'friends' with all those movie characters and other dumb accts.

vegasnick (who lives in missouri) can diamsf (ban worthy?)

and ms is myspace.

http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n...4210159sj5.jpg

Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nick = 100% gimmick

[/ QUOTE ]

there's just no way. no one could put this much time into a gimmick. in fact one of the people i thought most likely to be responsible for vegasnick was lurker.

[/ QUOTE ]
Probably the best gimmick ever if it is one. If it's real, well, probably the best real person ever.

Re: Nick\'s take on the Lurker situation
 

its 100% not a gimmick