Re: NL10 FT vs Stars
 

yep. with the same vp, you'll pay more like 5BB/100 at nl25 and 4 at 50.

beating 10 is harder to beat than a lot of people give it credit for being. table selection is important, even though there are so many bad players, because you basically have to crush the game to win.

Re: NL10 FT vs Stars
 

I wouldn't play at FT without rake.

Set it up once and profit forever as you move up.

Don't really think you need extensive table selection at NL10.

If you don't want RB I would stay at Stars.