Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=56)
-   -   he was a 79/71 (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=480930)

MDoranD 08-18-2007 10:49 PM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

is that so

jds1201 08-18-2007 10:52 PM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e7...bronlolec0.jpg

Jer672 08-18-2007 10:53 PM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol i think?

iveyleague24 08-18-2007 11:16 PM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
called for deception

JJBuffone 08-18-2007 11:58 PM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
Vanessa Rousso would approve.

ocdscale 08-19-2007 12:02 AM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

A+ level

08-19-2007 12:20 AM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
I love this

Abones 08-19-2007 12:26 AM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

ICMoney 08-19-2007 02:50 AM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
[] Put you on AK.

davebreal 08-19-2007 04:48 AM

Re: he was a 79/71
 
clear setup play for future quads.

high level planning.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.