Re: Maybe interesting hand, live TS, 10/20.
 

bobbo, maybe its possible with your turn call he puts you on a wider range than just a 2

Re: Maybe interesting hand, live TS, 10/20.
 

dud u godafull ouse callnw

Re: Maybe interesting hand, live TS, 10/20.
 

dude u got a full house call now

Re: Maybe interesting hand, live TS, 10/20.
 

[ QUOTE ]
dude u got a full house call now

[/ QUOTE ]

You make good reads.

Re: Results
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
fold the river, he has 77 and knows you have a deuce or a busted flush draw, so he may as well go for a big score. if he was bluffing, he'd bet much smaller into that range of hands.

as for the earlier streets, i'm in favor of all as played.

[/ QUOTE ]

mmmkay I guess my post wasnt great. oh well. i thoguht for a while and my process was the same as dj sensei's. im not one to make big folds v often (especially FULL HOUSES) but basically on the river his hand is 33 (yah right) 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 77 2x or a busted flush draw. (hell, wouldnt put it past for him to have 32) if he could have a busted flush draw, he could have the 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] since it means he's aggro enough to raise the turn w/ that.

i would've called against someone my own age, but when it boiled down to it, i just reverted to rule 1, which is when old people put alot of money into the pot, you need the nuts or 2nd nuts to call them. so i folded. (plus, the price he laid me made it bad if i was either splitting to 2x or losing, 1700 to technically win 500...)

he showed KJ[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]

sucks when not only do you lose the pot, but you can't tell if it was because he was a level above or a level below the one you put him on.

Re: Results
 

not joking here, 2p2 sucks so much. DJ sensei, you're the man, the rest of you, try to post something meaningful, rather then junk.

[ QUOTE ]
sucks when not only do you lose the pot, but you can't tell if it was because he was a level above or a level below the one you put him on.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just played it badly, I'm allowed a misplay every day or so. It's a call, but oh well. Afterall, I have a full house.

Re: Results
 

bobbo,

given description of villain and the way you played the hand this seems like an auto-call. i think that's why you have gotten poor responses.

Re: Results
 

I think tanking on the turn is a mistake. The turn is a fairly standard call, I would say, especially since he limped utg+1.

For all he knows you have A7 or 88.


As played, it doesn't make much sense for him to overbet the river after you tank the turn. Tanking the turn just doesn't make much sense with 77, a boat or 2x.


Because of this, I would say that a call is closer than otherwise.

Re: Results
 

I dont see how bebo played it that bad, i mean when he leads out on flop his range is 7x,2x and maybe XsXs. But when he leads the turn i mean is he doing this with 7x? is he doing this with spades.

Villian must put him on a strong hand, Id fold the river.

Re: Results
 

[ QUOTE ]
it doesn't make much sense for him to overbet the river after you tank the turn. Tanking the turn just doesn't make much sense with 77, a boat or 2x.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what you are saying is that villain is more likely to overbet the pot if hero is likely to have a monster (boat) here?

Do you put him on quads?