Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   Nl100, ZOMG a set (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=474249)

+EV 08-10-2007 02:05 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
[ QUOTE ]
this guy seems terrible. monies in on turn please

as played id crai

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree the play seems bad, but OP's read was that he is decent. We have to play him as such.

+EV

Unknown Soldier 08-10-2007 02:06 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
but im saying he isnt based on his play here

a decent player wouldnt do this with ATC

+EV 08-10-2007 02:09 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
[ QUOTE ]
but im saying he isnt based on his play here

a decent player wouldnt do this with ATC

[/ QUOTE ]

Not sure what ATC is.

+Ev

Unknown Soldier 08-10-2007 02:10 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
any two cards

HumbertHumbert 08-10-2007 02:12 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
yeah sure villain could play 1010 this way but come on you're getting 4 to 1 on your call here!!!!

luckbox666 08-10-2007 02:19 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
you can't call the turn and fold the river on a blank (unless you put him on a straight - which is very possible). as played, i call and hope for the best.

bunga 08-10-2007 02:24 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't like that fold. I feel like the $2 on the turn was a pretty transparent block bet, you knew that and made it pot to take away a cheap card at a flush draw. He decided to try to draw out on you and called. The diamond didn't come on the river, but you checked. He knew the only way he could win the pot was to bet, so that is what he did.

I could be completely wrong of course, but I would have lead out half pot on any non-diamond, non-3 river. At the least, i would have check-called.

Edit: My first post and I misread the hand. I missed CO's raise on the turn. I push or fold turn. Probably push.

[/ QUOTE ]

This has to be a gimmick acount levelling.

gimmetheloot 08-10-2007 02:28 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
this is awful.

awful awful awful fold.

he checked a set on the flop last to act vs 3 ppl?

maybe he has A3s, but not 63s......

im calling him down.

Xanta 08-10-2007 02:32 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
You do realize that by folding this you are putting him on a range of exactly one hand, right? Getting 4-1?

Galwegian 08-10-2007 02:43 PM

Re: Nl100, ZOMG a set
 
[ QUOTE ]
I was getting the odds to fill up on the turn, assuming he has A3 or 56s

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I am much more concerned about over sets. I think you get 3bet pf by AA-QQ and JJ-TT may just call. Other hands that just call are more likely to have hit a set like TT. I don't see the 3bet with middle pp's that didn't connect. However, I just don't put villain on 65s. Maybe A3.


[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
The worst in my opinion is a bet/call since I think there is a strong chance this is going to get raised if we bet. I want to felt this hand. I call the river suck bet and yell at my dog if I was behind to 65s.


[/ QUOTE ]

Why are people talking about 65s?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.