Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
last 2 posters didnt relize that 8PTBB/100 is practically impossible in current NL100 games on sites that accept US players

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp

[/ QUOTE ]

LOLOLOL.

Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

BEAT: I'm running at 4.18 BB/100 and am up $900+ in 25 hrs of play

[/ QUOTE ]

Since when is [censored] 4.18ptbb/100 at 100nl a brag?

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

8ptbb/100 is impossible?
are.you.serious.

Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

[ QUOTE ]
8ptbb/100 is impossible?
are.you.serious.

[/ QUOTE ]

i've played < 4k hands of ssnl in my career and i'm fairly confident i can beat 50nl today for 8ptbb

Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

I've played <50 hands of 600NL and beat it for > 35ptbb/100, so I'm pretty sure 8ptbb at a lower stake is sustainable.

Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

[ QUOTE ]
http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/4...l200400mm2.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]

VINDICATION BABY!

Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

Game selection is key to making 8+ PTBB/100.

Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

um, the person who posted 200 & 400nl. you do realize that what you posted is BB and not PTBB. you are only making <4PTBB.

you could make 8PTBB in 100NL if you picked like the top 2-3 tables from multiple sites. if you play on 1 site and play 8+ tables 8PTBB is unsustainable and no 50k isn't a good sample size.

the OP's post is stupid anyways, you call 4 BI swings variance? thats not even close to high variance. thats like standard.

Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
 

[ QUOTE ]
um, the person who posted 200 & 400nl. you do realize that what you posted is BB and not PTBB. you are only making <4PTBB.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are wrong, DUCY? Even if you were right, it would be > 4PTBB, yes?