Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
that's an awfully high percentage of $100k+ incomes when considering the number of passers-by and low-stakes college-stuent pqrt-timer types.
No way that large a percentage of 2+2'ers makes $100k+. |
Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
i really doubt the accuracy of these stats what exactly are they based upon?
|
Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
|
Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
hmmm thread would be better with pics....
http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2006/writers/a...e/p1_beard.jpg http://www.miamisunpost.com/archives...da%20beard.jpg http://www.20minutos.es/data/img/2005/03/10/45859.jpg |
Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
lol @ all the porn 2+2 reads. I had no idea 2+2 was so asian.
|
Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
I could be reading this wrong, but those stats are as compared to the internet average, right? So it's not that we have a high percentage of $100k earners, it's that we have more than twice the average of $100k earners on other sites. Which makes sense to me.
Skunkworks, please take it easy on the porn, you're making us all look bad. |
Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
[ QUOTE ]
I had no idea 2+2 was so asian. [/ QUOTE ] Ugh... http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/image...ting416300.jpg |
Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
[ QUOTE ]
hmmm thread would be better with pics.... [/ QUOTE ] http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thu...e_computer.jpg |
Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
|
Re: Interesting 2+2 stats:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.