Re: hawt or not?
 

Since I sincerely doubt you'd check a K or a 5 twice, but it's quite concievable that he did, can't an opponent who reads hands well 3-bet you here a lot?

Re: hawt or not?
 

vs this villain this is perfectly fine.

Re: hawt or not?
 

i don't see the value unless he is bet-calling A-high, which seems very unlikely.

Re: hawt or not?
 

i seriously have no idea, this is just weird.

Re: hawt or not?
 

I can see him folding a better J here from time to time. I doubt it`s worth it.

Re: hawt or not?
 

ya villain is a clown who cant read hands.

he snapcalled Qhi, still not sure if its good, against him i think it is

Re: hawt or not?
 

fine as long as he doesnt have a bet-3bet bluff trigger

Re: hawt or not?
 

[ QUOTE ]
i seriously have no idea, this is just weird.

[/ QUOTE ]

i would have written this exactly.

Re: hawt or not?
 

this is awesome wiht QJ

Re: hawt or not?
 

[ QUOTE ]
this is awesome wiht any J

[/ QUOTE ] if the villain is bad since this is so weird, you will get called by A high a lot.