Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

there is no such thing as 300nl

Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

I know, this is all an elaborate hoax. I even broke a bunch of stuff to make it seem real. And I'm still playing chasing my imaginary losses...

Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

Looks OK, I played a hand similar once:

** Game ID 729750363 starting - 2007-04-15 02:53:06
** Heidegger [Hold 'em] (1.00|2.00 No Limit - Cash Game) Real Money

- muppet sitting in seat 1 with $669.56
- spillihp34 sitting in seat 3 with $194.35
- flyfish sitting in seat 4 with $363.20 [Dealer]
- SinkRox sitting in seat 5 with $910.89
- vivajo sitting in seat 6 with $191.00

SinkRox posted the small blind - $1.00
vivajo posted the big blind - $2.00

** Dealing card to SinkRox: K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

muppet raised - $4.00
spillihp34 folded
flyfish folded
SinkRox called - $4.00
vivajo folded

** Dealing the flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] k[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($10)
SinkRox bet - $10.00
muppet raised - $40.00
SinkRox called - $40.00

** Dealing the turn: A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($90)
SinkRox checked
muppet bet - $90.00
SinkRox called - $90.00

** Dealing the river: 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
SinkRox checked
muppet bet - $270.00
SinkRox called - $270.00
muppet shows: 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
SinkRox shows: K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

SinkRox wins $808.00 from the main pot

Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

The pitfalls of loose-passive.

Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

OP, you suck. You're calling range is far to wide

Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

[ QUOTE ]
And no that isn't headsup. It's 6-max.


Right after the $1000 pot hand, this happened on another table. And this was a misclick PF [yeah right] . I don't call PF hands like this [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] , the K2 was just because of implied odds [O RLY? Implied odds with K2? LOL, study up on "implied odds" , loose PF calls, loose flop & turn calls, and overshoving a weak 2P on draw heavy river] and ultradonkey plays like every single hand. [apparently so do you] I did push because I was tilting. It's nice getting it all in 80% favored after losing a huge pot...
[and tilting away another buy in]

OP....
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/1676/yousuckto9.gif

Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

Are you ultradonkey?

Can't my PF range be more loose if villain has a big stack? Isn't that implied odds since I have a chance to win a bigger pot? I'm not actually sure how/why I called with K2o, I normally wouldn't. Also my VPIP is 20%, compared to villain's 69%. Did you miss the part that he lost $3000 in this session? He was bluffing $300 on rivers, calling with A high, et cetera. He would have played the same way with QQ/AK/A9/88/etc.

And yes, tilting another buyin away 80% ahead.

I guess I should challenge you to a headsup battle. But I'm not sure it'd be fair. You seem too smart.

Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

please post YOUR PT stats, I CALL BS on 20% vpip and you even possibly being a winnarrr

And I'm not ultradonkey, I dont know what site you play on that spreads 300nl and can't discern it from the hh you posted either

Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

OP

"Isn't that implied odds"

Sweet implied odds with K2o dude!

Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
 

He was probably thinking something like dis:

"K2o is the nuts in a raised pot OOP, If I flop bottom pair of 2's, its usually good, If I'd flopped a King, no way he has a better one when he raised pf right?!?! And with 2 pair, wooohhooo I made my 'implied odds' pay me.... oh wait, where's my Mongies yoo?!!!!"