Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

Meh I think it's bad but I'm sure you could convince me otherwise

Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

pros: this seems like an ideal spot for a PVS from gramps
cons: A9 is a really bad hand to snap off with b/c you're usually crushed if wrong

i prob call for stack size reasons

Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

I prob call so I can post it and show everyone I play with how light I call.

Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

[ QUOTE ]
pros: this seems like an ideal spot for a PVS from gramps
cons: A9 is a really bad hand to snap off with b/c you're usually crushed if wrong

i prob call for stack size reasons

[/ QUOTE ]

I was thinking I fold for stack size reasons. Colin sorta explained it. If you fold this and one of the other two short stacks busts in L6 (to either pudge or other bigstack), then you can basically steal gramps chips at will.

Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

But if you call and win, you're ON the bubble and can steal EVERYONE's stacks at will.

Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

Pudge ... admit it, it was a spite call [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Something I intend to do asap as well, coz he called one of my MP shoves with a pathetic pair of queens and bust me last time we played.

Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

[ QUOTE ]
But if you call and win, you're ON the bubble and can steal EVERYONE's stacks at will.

[/ QUOTE ]

exactly

and if you call and lose, you are oop vs. gramps and have approximately the same stack with 2 other much shorter stacks

Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

[censored] THAT INSTACALL.

Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

SHOW GRAMPS WHO THE [censored] BOSS IS.

Re: $225 Thin/Bad Call vs. Gramps.
 

THIS IS MY SNG YOU'RE DEAD PAL.