Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   NL200 - AK, 3bet pot (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=382834)

tubasteve 04-19-2007 11:52 AM

Re: NL200 - AK, 3bet pot
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this guy has a spade draw in a 3-bet pot like never compared to the times he has 77-99 or a ten.

[/ QUOTE ]

exactly, and that hand IS folding about 95 percent of the time after a pot bet on the turn, i would like betting the turn here with AQ much more than AK, i like the line, you may get someone to bluff the river or you could get 77-99 to pay you off now

[/ QUOTE ]

exactly

RiverFenix 04-19-2007 11:54 AM

Re: NL200 - AK, 3bet pot
 
[ QUOTE ]
this guy has a spade draw in a 3-bet pot like never compared to the times he has 77-99 or a ten.

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously the spades comment was a little silly. If he has spades their either combo or overs and hes probably c/rai. Flat calling flop he has a weak 1pr type hand and doesnt want you to bluff him off when you have AK or has a set and wants you to commit yourself on turn.

Mossberg 04-19-2007 11:56 AM

Re: NL200 - AK, 3bet pot
 
Is 3betting a 25/5 UTG raiser standard for everyone here? I figure that we're always behind his range, and we will never take it down on the flop with a cbet once he calls (unless of course we hit an A or K and he has exactly JJ/QQ).

Pete H 04-19-2007 11:59 AM

Re: NL200 - AK, 3bet pot
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this guy has a spade draw in a 3-bet pot like never compared to the times he has 77-99 or a ten.

[/ QUOTE ]

exactly, and that hand IS folding about 95 percent of the time after a pot bet on the turn, i would like betting the turn here with AQ much more than AK, i like the line, you may get someone to bluff the river or you could get 77-99 to pay you off now

[/ QUOTE ]

exactly

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep. And JJ-QQ might also fold for turn bet, but if I check the turn those will call the river for sure.

MTBlue 04-19-2007 12:03 PM

Re: NL200 - AK, 3bet pot
 
[ QUOTE ]
if he bets turn he has to play for stacks I like the check behind. I think you played this hand perfect on every street

[/ QUOTE ]

Why the hell wouldn't you want to play for stacks here? Could you please elucidate me.

tubasteve 04-19-2007 12:06 PM

Re: NL200 - AK, 3bet pot
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if he bets turn he has to play for stacks I like the check behind. I think you played this hand perfect on every street

[/ QUOTE ]

Why the hell wouldn't you want to play for stacks here? Could you please elucidate me.

[/ QUOTE ]

if we get c/r on turn, we are probably behind a lot. regardless i would probably call and if he had a set, chalk it up to a cold deck.

there's no reason to play for stacks here though, because checking the turn maximizes our EV anyway, and if he leads river we are just calling.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.