Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=56)
-   -   a simple aq/ak riggedness question (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=363131)

doubLe a tom 03-24-2007 03:15 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
lol OP, Good sample size. That is very standard, and mild variance.

fusting4321 03-24-2007 03:18 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
[ QUOTE ]



3) you lose 10 sng's in a row (assuming "equal skill" this would be 0.7 to the power of 10



[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe we shouldnt be assuming equal skill, no? Hint Hint

NU Star 03-24-2007 03:22 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
[ QUOTE ]
Just because something unlikely happens doesn't mean that it's rigged. What are the chances that you'll be dealt 5d 4h on one hand, and then 7s Th on the next hand? 1 in 7,033,103. That's extremely unlikely. But just because you were dealt those two hands back to back doesn't mean that online poker is rigged.

BBV: Serious Business

[/ QUOTE ]

This seems wrong...unless it has to be those cards in that specific order.

kylma 03-24-2007 03:23 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]



3) you lose 10 sng's in a row (assuming "equal skill" this would be 0.7 to the power of 10



[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe we shouldnt be assuming equal skill, no? Hint Hint

[/ QUOTE ]

You're correct.. My ROI is 16%. so it's not equal skill. I just made it more simple for the sake of simplification

SneakyFerret 03-24-2007 03:25 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
[ QUOTE ]


I said top top, not two pair..

[/ QUOTE ]

OHFreak 03-24-2007 03:53 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
I SAID TOP TOP M'FER

saucyspade19 03-24-2007 03:55 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


I said top top, not two pair..

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

a jamie gold reference in a thread about variance, ha, how appropriate.

pokerchap 03-24-2007 04:00 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
let me guess.. full tilt?

AlwaysWrong 03-24-2007 05:32 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
Here's a better question: What are the chances that if I go back and look at my last 10,000 hands I can find some stat that in isolation looks extremely unlikely? I'd go for nearly certain, if I look hard enough.

This thread is either a joke (and not that funny) or OP should never play poker again.

GrandMelon 03-24-2007 05:37 PM

Re: a simple aq/ak riggedness question
 
[ QUOTE ]
[x] you might suck

[/ QUOTE ]

wait.. fixed my own post

[x] you do suck


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.