Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
AK is drawing to 6 outs yo. i'd rather cheecck cheddar like a food inspector.
|
Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
He has TT, 99 or cheese here >15% of the time - so I begrudging call.
|
Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
[ QUOTE ]
He has TT, 99 or cheese here >15% of the time - so I begrudging call. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure if I agree with you on this one. His line is consistent with a bigger overpair. Maybe he's worried about two pair on the flop for some reason...I dunno...but he certainly doesn't think Hero is helped by the 3 on the turn, so why not push it in at this point? He doesn't cover by incredibly much more. |
Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
You are a slice of Heinen's White Bread, finely toasted.
It's a fold, even with the pot odds. And betting that turn is like stabbing yourself in the knee and then pouring battery acid into it. |
Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
scream mommy and fold.
|
Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
check turn.
|
Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
I'd fold despite the pot odds. Look at your read on him, you're beat and the chances of spiking a J don't make it worth it to call.
I'd say you're behind like 93% of the time. |
Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
check turn, reevaluate on river.
on river, if he bets, i guess a call is read dependent if he checks, bet for value |
Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
[ QUOTE ]
check turn, reevaluate on river. on river, if he bets, i guess a call is read dependent if he checks, bet for value [/ QUOTE ] why did you decide your post was worth bumping this thread from 8 months ago? |
Re: NL200 - Oh wait...Is that a stack-a-donk?
It helps to include the sn when you are referring to regulars.
Also: you just got bamboozled. Awesome turn check by villain with KK+. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.